L2 · GUIDELINE
Protective Techniques and Postural Strategies for Individuals With Blindness or Low Vision
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · Gersony A et al. · 2026
Open the source for full results.
For ophthalmologists · 06:00 CET, weekdays
Never miss a paper in your field again.
Every weekday, the ten new ophthalmology papers that matter in your subspecialty, checked against the source and graded. Twelve minutes, before your first patient.
14 days free · then €49/year
Recommended by
“I recommend rounds to any colleague who wants to stay on top of the literature without missing what matters. It reads and verifies, it does not just notify.”
Dr. med. Detlev R. H. Breyer
Breyer, Kaymak & Klabe Augenchirurgie / Premium Eyes · Düsseldorf
Today’s brief
Today’s briefFrom the morning brief
L1 · META-ANALYSIS
Efficacy of capsular bag fixation versus ciliary sulcus fixation IOL implantation
International ophthalmology · 2026
L1 · META-ANALYSIS
Conflicts of Interest Transparency, Study Outcomes
American journal of ophthalmology · 2026
3 of today’s papersSee today’s →
This is the same evidence card a reader opens. Your first fourteen days are the full ten, every weekday. Keeping them is €49/year.
~1,000Screened overnight
10In the brief
~12 minTo read
CheckedAgainst the source
Why rounds. exists
The trade you made every week.
Every week it was the same trade. Read fifty abstracts, or miss the one paper that would have changed your Tuesday afternoon in clinic. So I built rounds.
The literature does not slow down for clinic. rounds. is the part that reads it for you, overnight, so the choosing is already done by the time you sit down.
What your morning is now
Your morning, rewritten.
From fifty abstracts to ten papers you can trust.
One scan over coffee, before the first patient. The night’s literature is already read, graded, and ranked for the way you practice. You decide what reaches you, the evidence does the rest, so you read with your own judgment rather than against a black box.
01 · Source
Checked against the source.
Every number checked against the source: effect sizes, sample sizes, the figures a decision turns on. Where the summary and the paper disagree, the paper wins.
02 · Fit
Ranked for your practice.
Relevance is scored against your subspecialty and your open clinical questions, nothing else. The ranking learns from how you rate what you read.
03 · Evidence
The evidence, shown.
Evidence level, certainty grade, effect size and confidence interval ride along with every paper. You see how it was graded, weaknesses and all.
Ten papers in, you have read the day. Twelve minutes, before clinic.
Who builds it, and how it stays honest
Built by a physician who reads it himself.
“I read it myself every morning, before yours lands.”
As a physician, I built rounds with practicing specialists in the field. It began when a colleague asked me about a study I had not read, and I did not want that feeling again. So I built what I wished existed: an editor that reads the new literature overnight and checks every finding against the source. I read it every morning before I see patients. If a card is not good enough for my own reading, it does not ship.
Funded by its readers
rounds. takes no pharma money and runs no ads. The clinicians who subscribe are its only customers, so the only thing worth optimizing for is whether the evidence earns your twelve minutes.
Read by a clinician first
The physician who built rounds. is based in Zürich and reads the same brief you do. It has to clear the same bar he holds a journal to before he trusts it with a clinical decision.
Funded by its readers
Why clinicians keep the twelve minutes.
“I don’t read papers outside of rounds anymore. It replaced my daily manual PubMed search.”
Dr. H.S.
Cataract and Refractive Surgeon · FEBO, FMH · Germany
“It is remarkable how many medical retina papers show up in my daily brief that I would have missed otherwise.”
Dr. H.M.
Medical Retina · Austria
“Exactly what I needed for my daily practice.”
Dr. I.H.
Ophthalmic Surgeon · FEBO · France
Quotes published with written approval.
13 cents a day to stay current
One brief. Fourteen days free.
Every signup starts with fourteen days of the full brief. The founding rate is locked for life for the first 50 readers.
13 centsa day
About €4 a month. €49 a year, billed once. Cancel anytime.
How the 14 days work
Today
€0The full brief, from day one.
Day 14
Trial endsA reminder lands before anything is charged.
Day 15
≈ €4/ month€49 billed once a year.
About €4 a month, locked for life for the first 50. €49 a year, billed once
- ·Ten papers every weekday, picked for your subspecialty
- ·The deep clinical Read on every paper
- ·Evidence grade · effect size · bias signals
- ·What it means for your practice
- ·Your subspecialty, the full archive since you joined
Start your 14 days free →
14 days free. Then about €4 a month (€49 a year, billed once).
Our promise
Try rounds free for 14 days. If you subscribe and it is not worth it, tell us within 90 days and we refund every cent.
Plus VAT where applicable · Reverse-charge for EU businesses · See the full offer →
Start here
Start with today’s brief.
Your first fourteen days are the full brief. €49/year keeps the full read on every paper: what the evidence means for your practice and how far to trust it.
Nothing to set up. Nothing to migrate. The full brief is ready the moment you join, and every weekday morning after.
14 days free · then €49/year
Founding Reader · First 50 · €49/year, locked for life